It's snapshot mechanism is more fine-grained than common, but it pays a price for that in that delete operations are handled badly (slowly, inefficiently). Hammer is by far not the first file system with snapshots. Now I am ready to listen either a prove, that I am wrong, or an excuse about being not well informed. They work perfectly well!īoth helped me to save many files over long time. If immediately after deleting a file one would try to recover it the success probability is practically 100%.Īlmost anyone who were using Linux more than a year usually know about them. They all are based on simple principle - none of FS do really delete files! Such tools are existed for almost every FS, if it has a certain level of popularity. Linux users seems to be much more educated what concerns computers, OS and FS. It seems FBSD has a real problem to survive in that world. To do that one need to have certain level of qualification in the topic. You definitely do not know their situationĪnd can not charge on it. Please, answer messages only if you wish to HELP! not to blame other people.
It seems that some people without a clue in everything are most aggressive to teach others! They just can't stop do it even And that IS the case if you just deleted a file. Therefore FAT and EXT files systems do have undelete feauture as long as you don't use freed blocks again. If all those who blamed people for not doing backups would know just a little how really almost all FS work, they would fully understand Therefore you either help or stay calm = shut up. So I suggest you don't talk to people like that. Therefore you are totally wrong! Or better to say you have no clue. Are you personally doing backups every 2 minutes? - Probably not. Your position to blame me for not doing a backup. If I cannot restore all these files which is very easy on very old FAT, whom I have to blame?
#Zfs file system windows software#
To me it's a bug in software it cannot delete any config files without implicit confirmation from user. If you can't even see the SMB share, then check to make sure that ZFS is working/running on your system, along with checking to make sure that SMB is working/running on your system as well.Now all my config files from. If that doesn't work - then it depends on whether you can even see the SMB share or not. So I'll double check that.Īnd make sure that the host can write to that mountpoint as a non-root user. su or sudo), the owner/group will be root, root, respectively. Sometimes, if you create the mountpoint with the root account (e.g. I would ssh into your host system as the user for that /path/to/zfs/mountpoint and write a file there to see if your user credentials work with that mountpoint. $ sudo chmod 777 -R /path/to/zfs/mountpointĢ) Check your smb.conf or nf file to make sure that it has the appropriate permissions allowed, I think it's under the "directory" heading/directive. It's been a while since I've set up a ZFS share, but the two things that I would check would be:ġ) Check to make sure that the ZFS mountpoint on your hosting server has rwx permissions for root, group, and user, and that it has the correct owner for the mountpoint e.g.: I have tried that but the it says i dont have the permsĪnd i cant change that because it doesnt show up on the perms page
0 kommentar(er)
